Competition or Collaboration?

Competition or Collaboration?

Image result for no contest the case against competitionCompetition has been touted as human nature, but is it?  This idea was first brought into question for me by a book by the author and educator Alfie Kohn.  It is called “No Contest: The Case AgainstCompetition.”  I encourage anyone reading this entry to check out this book and read it for yourself.  He puts it more clearly than I would be able to in this short post.  It may be difficult for many to accept the idea of eliminating competition from schools without having read the book.  I know it was for me.  If you don’t have the time to read it, he has a great video lecture that touches on some of the points laid out in the book.   Long story short, competition is not only not human nature, but it is detrimental to the classroom.  Part of the reason this belief has gone so long is because of who benefits from it.  By placing a culture of competition at the base of society, the people at the bottom are constantly working against each other and so distracted from looking at the true source of their issues, which are usually stemming from the top.  One false connection that is constantly used is that of humans to the competitive and sometimes violent chimpanzees.  Although we are both primates we should be looking towards a closer cousin, the bonobo, for better understanding of our nature.  To learn more about this I would recommend the book “The Bonobo and the Atheist,” by Frans de Waal.  We are also constantly bombarded with media that works to justify and encourage competition in every area of our lives.


So how has competition affected us in modern day society?  You can see it in every aspect of our society from business, to sports, to even dating.  We buy more and more expensive accessories and clothes, makeup and hairstyles in order to beat out competitors in the dating world.  We even have television dating games that glorify this at a whole new level.  In business we have larger companies eliminating other businesses that we label as competitors, either through putting them out of business or buying them out.  One good example of this is WalMart.  An in depth documentary showcasing the cost of this practice is WalMart: The High Cost of LowPrices and here is a Frontline episode as well.  Even within companies there are winners at the top and losers at the bottom.  According to an article in Fortune magazine, American CEOs are making more than 300 times that of the average worker in their company.    Here is a list of the top 5 highest paid CEOs in the US.   While they make this much, their employees lack in health care benefits and even in a livable wage.  So why is all of this acceptable?  It’s because we have grown accustomed to winners and losers in our schools.   We are taught at an early age that it’s just how the world works.  Students get that message at every level in every class, but it’s not how it has to be. 


We can turn this trend around by transitioning our schools to a collaborative environment.  I’ve been able to do this in my classroom by changing my review games from competitive to collaborative.  In P.E. some might find it difficult to take competition out of the curriculum.  Elementary school is many students’ introduction to different sports and activities so I see no need to make it competitive at all.  When I played varsity basketball in high school my favorite activity was collaborative.  Here is a video explaining that drill.  And this can be done to teach the fundamentals of all sports.  In middle and high school, P.E. teachers may insist on competition but I would say that collaboration should still be what is emphasized throughout all of the activities.  So teams are constantly mixed up and the challenge is not beating the other team, but figuring out how to work together with a new group of people quickly.  At the end the coach could debrief students on what went well and what didn’t go so well and why.  Then encourage students to thank the classmates they were playing against for giving them this opportunity.  In games now, that is when we say “good game,” but I feel as though it loses more meaning each year as competition gets stronger and the significance is not explained.


 I would also recommend that P.E. teachers teach dance as well, which could be taught in collaboration with the Music teacher.  That would be even better because that models collaboration between adults to the students.  Dance is not only an exercise in collaboration between dance partners, but also would benefit the children in other ways.  It would help prepare them for social situations, like parties or school dances.  I know I had a lot of anxiety growing up because I didn’t know how to dance to certain songs.   Dance can also teach students about local and foreign culture. 



I would get rid of all awards systems, such as student of the month and even teacher of the year.  The issues with such programs are addressed in “No Contest,” and are discussed in more detail in his other book, “Punished By Rewards.”  These awards have a tendency to create competition and resentment for those who beat out others.  I noticed that in my schools, even with the teachers who won the label of “Model Teacher.”  Instead students could practice personally showing appreciation for each other.  In my student teaching, I had the pleasure of working with an amazing mentor who introduced me to the “Cheer Box.”  The students would write a cheer to a classmate.  It would be in response to help that was given, or well wishes, or get wells if someone was sick.  This eliminated competition and helped to improve the relationships between the students.  This could even be done with the teachers.   In my last title one school, the administrators encouraged teachers and staff to submit acknowledgements of coworkers that we felt we wanted to celebrate for whatever reason. 


Now some may say that we are taking away all of the fun celebrations and parties from the teachers and kids, like the cherished Award Ceremony.  I think we should transition away from the Awards Ceremony, which celebrates all of the winners over the losers.  In its place we could have another celebration celebrating learning.  What I imagine is a table at the entrance with notecards for students to write down what they were most proud of learning.  They fill it out then paste it to a big wall in the gym.  Then the whole night is celebrating how much the students learned throughout the year.  There could even be a cheer or gratitude wall where students wrote messages to teachers or staff who helped them in their learning.  And this event could double as a dance.  This is a celebration that every child could participate in and feel good about.


I have not touched on how we can move to collaboration in every area of our schools, but that doesn’t mean the discussion has to end here.  I challenge you to think outside the box and submit more ideas in the comment section.  And if you disagree I also challenge you to voice your disagreement with some explanation so I can understand where you are coming from.  Thank you for reading!


Earlier in the post I referenced American businesses and their desire for monopoly, which I would say stems somewhat from one of our countries’ favorite games, Monopoly.  Here is a link to a video about the origins and initial purpose behind the creation of this game.  

Comments